What are the implications of passive voice in user-generated content online such as promoting a neutral or impersonal tone? How does it affect the clarity, responsibility and authenticity of content? Why is passive voice often used in anonymous, review-based or complaint-driven online posts or forums?
Share
The use of passive voice in user-generated content online can have several implications, including:
1. Neutral or Impersonal Tone: Passive voice can contribute to a neutral or impersonal tone in user-generated content, as it often focuses more on the action being performed rather than the individual performing the action. This can be useful in certain contexts where objectivity and neutrality are important.
2. Clarity: Passive voice can sometimes make the sentence structure more complex and less direct, which may affect clarity. Active voice is generally considered more straightforward and easier to understand, so the use of passive voice could potentially lead to confusion for readers.
3. Responsibility: Passive voice can obscure the subject performing the action, thereby potentially shifting responsibility away from the individual or entity responsible for the action. This lack of transparency can impact how accountability is perceived in user-generated content.
4. Authenticity: Passive voice can sometimes be associated with a lack of transparency or authenticity, as it may conceal the identity of the person expressing opinions or making claims in online content. This can raise questions about the credibility and trustworthiness of the information being presented.
Passive voice is often used in anonymous, review-based, or complaint-driven online posts or forums for various reasons:
1. Anonymity: In anonymous contexts, the use of passive voice can help protect the identity of the writer, allowing them to express opinions or share experiences without revealing their personal details.
2. Review-Based Platforms: In review-based platforms, passive voice may be used