Passive voice can impact the persuasiveness of an argument by making statements sound less direct or forceful. When passive voice is used, the focus shifts from the subject performing the action to the action itself. This can distance the reader from the subject and make the argument seem less urgent or impactful.

Passive voice reduces the impact of an argument because it can obscure who is responsible for an action, leading to ambiguity or a lack of accountability. When the subject is not clearly identified as the agent of the action, the argument may lose its persuasive power as it becomes less clear who is driving the message forward.

Additionally, passive constructions can dilute the strength of persuasive communication by removing the emphasis from the subject or action. Instead of presenting a clear and direct message, passive voice can create a sense of detachment or ambiguity, making it easier for the reader to disengage or misinterpret the argument.

In summary, passive voice affects the persuasiveness of an argument by making statements less direct, reducing the urgency and impact of the message, and shifting the focus away from the subject or action, ultimately weakening the overall effectiveness of the argument.