Passive voice is often used in scientific reports to create a sense of objectivity by emphasizing the action or the result rather than the researcher performing the action. This is critical for unbiased presentation of research because it shifts the focus from the researcher to the processes, results, or findings themselves, allowing readers to focus on the information being presented rather than on the individuals behind the research.

By using passive voice, writers can maintain neutrality and credibility by depersonalizing their work and emphasizing factual evidence. This can help to avoid potential biases that may arise from attributing actions or results directly to the researcher. Additionally, using passive voice can make the writing more concise and formal, which is important in scientific writing.

For example, instead of saying “I conducted the experiment,” a writer could say “The experiment was conducted,” which shifts the focus to the experiment itself rather than the person conducting it. This can help to reinforce the credibility of the research by centering the attention on the research methods and results.

In conclusion, passive voice can be a valuable tool in scientific writing to create a sense of objectivity, maintain neutrality, and enhance the credibility of research reports by focusing on the information being presented rather than the individuals conducting the research.