Translating passive voice between languages can be challenging due to differences in grammar, syntax, and linguistic norms. The challenges include:

1. Structural Variances: Different languages have variations in sentence structure, which can impact how passive voice is formed. Not all languages have an equivalent construction to the passive voice, leading to potential loss of meaning or tone in translation.

2. Agency and Subject-Object Relations: Passive voice can obscure the relationship between subjects and objects in a sentence. Translating this can be complex, especially when trying to maintain clarity and accuracy in conveying the intended meaning.

3. Cultural Nuances: Passive constructions may carry different connotations in different cultures. Translators need to be aware of these nuances to ensure that the tone and implications of the passive voice are preserved across languages.

To overcome these challenges, translators can employ several strategies:

1. Focus on Meaning: Translators should prioritize conveying the intended meaning rather than direct equivalence of passive voice structures. Adapting the sentence structure or rephrasing may be necessary to maintain clarity and fidelity to the original text.

2. Contextual Understanding: Understanding the context in which passive voice is used can help translators make informed decisions about how to translate it effectively. This includes considering the broader discourse and communicative goals of the text.

3. Use of Active Voice: In cases where the passive voice cannot be directly translated, translators can opt for using the active voice to convey the same message.